The U.R. Debate Goes On.....

Over the weekend, I was rereading articles on U.R. and came across this website which supplies you with lots of reading material concerning the debate. I am constantly amazed at how theologians and church "scholars" just can't let go of Godly wrath, post-resurrection. These articles make for good reading. It is true that not everything can be explained exegetically to everyone's satisfaction to "prove" U.R. How about trusting the spirit's lead. Listen to your heart. You know who resides there. Why is it that these theologian-types and theologians/scholars require scriptural proof of U.R. when their own beliefs are faithbased, open to interpretation. Yet they will require scriptural agreement to even be open to the concept of universal reconciliation. It's "a mystery" to me. All I can conclude is that their livelihood (read paycheck) is based on remaining constant and faithful to religious beliefs of their assemblage. They are slaves to religion, whatever the variety they choose. They seek the approval, assent, endorsement, sanction, of man (the ones in their particular faction). I believe ascribing to a new, often radical, position, would, in their view, isolate them from all they hold dear. How very sad.

Here is the link to the various articles, if you are interested:
http://fireandrose.blogspot.com/2006/07/universalism-in-blogosphere.html